吴语协会

 找回密码
 开只户头

扫一扫,访问微社区

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
查看: 7311|回复: 22

BBC又犯贱

 关闭 [复制链接]
发表于 2008-5-15 12:36:49 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
China quake response under scrutiny
As China copes with its worst earthquake in more than 20 years,differing views are emerging in the Chinese media of the government's response.

Official news outlets such as the main English-language paper China Daily paint a positive picture of the authorities' handling of the disaster, both in terms of rescue efforts and keeping the public informed.

But one mainland commentator - in a paper in the southern city of Guangzhou - complains that public disaster awareness has proven tobe woefully inadequate, while Hong Kong dailies say the Beijing authorities still fall short in terms of openness and concern for thefate of ordinary people.

EDITORIAL IN CHINA DAILY:

TV footage of Wen [Prime Minister Wen Jiabao] touring disaster zones, organising rescue work on the spot and consoling victims trapped in ruins has not just drawn tears from national audiences: we are seeing the nation joining hands to defy the ruthless forces of nature.

Wen has set an admirable example which best illustrates the current leadership's emphasis on public well-being... Our national emergency response mechanisms have emerged stronger through the tests over theyears.

WU HANGMIN, OFFICIAL CHINESE NEWS AGENCY XINHUA:

[The government's] performance has scored high marks [onopenness about the earthquake]. Timely information disclosure,effective mobile phone messages and the internet undoubtedly played an enormously significant role in communicating the facts as quickly aspossible, in order to dispel panic among the public.

LIU KEMEI IN GUANGZHOU DAILY:

There is a lack of awareness of public security in both public education and the media. Unlike in economic development, where accomplishments are conspicuous, disaster awareness campaigns and public education take a lot of time and effort.

This lack of awareness has resulted in numerous insufficiencies in disaster-precaution education.

EDITORIAL IN HONG KONG'S APPLE DAILY:

白痴小报的话也好意思拿来作依据?
   
What has shocked and enraged people most is that a great number of kindergartens, primary and secondary schools collapsed and that numerous children and youths were buried alive and died tragically.

How could the authorities still attempt to escape with the excuse that it is a natural disaster? In comparison, those well-built government buildings remain undamaged... However, the government suppressed such information for the sake of maintaining stability.

有封锁消息么?睁眼说瞎话。不是自然灾害还是大癞蛤蟆发功咯?

EDITORIAL IN THE HONG KONG ECONOMIC JOURNAL:

We hope the Chinese government will not shoot the messenger butinstead step up investigations into the possible blunders and publicgrievances revealed by those reports, in order to alleviate further tragedies not directly caused by the natural disaster...

你怎么知道人家没调查?站着说话不腰疼

To build a completely transparent system, the Chinese government shouldn't view overseas criticism from the perspective of conspiracy theory, but instead investigate whether the state has sufficient capability to forecast earthquakes.

国际上有几个批评的?明明就自己在跳,莫非真把自己当overseas了。。。。


BBC Monitoring selects and translates news from radio, television, press, newsagencies and the internet from 150 countries in more than 70 languages.It is based in Caversham, UK, and has several bureaux abroad.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7400300.stm


[ 本帖最后由 mandarin 于 2008-5-15 14:43 编辑 ]
发表于 2008-5-15 12:51:20 | 显示全部楼层
APPLE DAILY 不是什么小报,是香港第一大报。

看不出来有什么犯贱的,讲的基本都是实情,比CCTV一口一个“情绪稳定”“重要指示”强得多。
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-15 14:26:55 | 显示全部楼层
对啊,销售量第一的八卦小报,咋了

实情?你是说校舍医院倒塌政府机关挺立的消息被政府封锁了这个实情吗?CCTV要大家情绪稳定也有错了?你想干嘛?
发表于 2008-5-15 14:42:01 | 显示全部楼层
最起码人家不是靠造谣假新闻达到销售量第一的。如果说Apple Daily没有公信力,那么国内的喉舌们算什么?

CCTV不是要大家情绪稳定,而是说灾区人民情绪稳定。这不是睁眼说瞎话么?你要是死了爹娘孩子,你情绪能稳定么?媒体的良心职责到哪里去了。

至于校舍医院倒塌政府机关挺立的消息么,根本不用封锁,白痴心里都清楚得很。
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-15 14:57:28 | 显示全部楼层
什么叫"最起码不靠造谣假新闻"?不造假就光荣了?我还说新华社最起码不靠捕风捉影八卦绯闻呢~~~
荡妇自诩不强奸,我们还不偷情呢,多光荣啊


不说要灾区稳定说什么?就是说说灾区稳定又怎么了?谁死了亲人不是要边上人来安慰两句的?安慰的话也无非是要他情绪稳定之类。怎么?政府来安慰两句就不许了?至于是否安慰得了那是另一个问题。可安慰本身有什么可指责的?

既然根本不用封锁,事实也没有封锁,可人家香港白痴报纸就说你锁了。大概这就是你说“不靠造谣假新闻”吧


还有,小囡你修养真叫一个差
发表于 2008-5-15 15:01:15 | 显示全部楼层
动不动就骂别人修养差的人是什么东西,我就不说了。
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-15 15:02:26 | 显示全部楼层
是指责,谢谢
发表于 2008-5-15 15:04:57 | 显示全部楼层
又开始贼忒兮兮嬉皮笑脸了,呵呵。
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-15 15:07:49 | 显示全部楼层
随你吧,反正你不骂两句不爽的
大家都有数麦
没工夫陪你无聊
你自己玩吧
发表于 2008-5-15 15:09:58 | 显示全部楼层
发帖量第一的水王论坛第一搅屎棍竟然没空陪我“无聊”,我很受宠若惊。
发表于 2008-5-15 22:58:04 | 显示全部楼层
我老早讲过了,国家发生了这么大的灾难,谁在吵来吵去谁就是畜生。

小囡:你看果然畜生本色不到黄金七十二小时就冒出来了,你不要和这种无聊的人一般见识,你是这里除了吴人最有修养的版主
发表于 2008-5-16 03:11:54 | 显示全部楼层
啊呀,看见你们被扣了那么多分,我觉得很不和谐啊,给你们加分吧
发表于 2008-5-16 03:15:40 | 显示全部楼层
居然一天只能有评四十分的权限。。。没办法,我只好给你们一人加十三分,多出来一分,既然阿奴说吴人好,我就加给吴人去算了
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-16 10:17:22 | 显示全部楼层


抢占14楼
发表于 2008-5-16 11:20:49 | 显示全部楼层
大家先住口吧
主帖的標題可以改脫了……
就算我犯賤,求你們了
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-16 11:45:21 | 显示全部楼层
bbc又不是谁的id

碍着谁了不成
发表于 2008-5-16 12:50:48 | 显示全部楼层
有意思吗,开口闭口就畜牲的
发表于 2008-5-16 22:46:41 | 显示全部楼层
BBC是为了中国人民在行使舆论监督职责,真是难为他们了。。。
发表于 2008-5-16 22:47:51 | 显示全部楼层
BBC、CNN是当代新闻媒体的典范
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-16 23:00:26 | 显示全部楼层
cnn又是道歉又是正面报道地震号称“感动”无数美国民众

一抽就听话,允称贱骨头

bbc cnn果然一对难兄难弟,其名虽异,其贱一也
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 开只户头

本版积分规则

手机版|Archiver|吴语协会 Wu Chinese Society ( 网友言论不代表本站观点 )

GMT+8, 2026-7-22 04:46

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表